2001 NCAA College World Series

Team Statistics


Overall Statistics


2001 NCAA College World Series Conference Overall Statistics (as of Aug 03, 2007) (All games Sorted by Batting avg) Team AVG G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI TB SLG% BB HBP SO GDP OB% SF SH SB-ATT PO A E FLD% Tennessee........... .394 4 160 48 63 11 2 8 45 102 .638 13 6 20 4 .451 3 1 12-14 105 43 3 .980 Miami (Fla.)........ .373 4 142 49 53 11 0 9 46 91 .641 30 3 30 1 .483 3 2 13-17 108 47 2 .987 Tulane.............. .343 3 105 19 36 7 0 1 18 46 .438 9 4 17 6 .408 2 3 2-5 78 24 8 .927 Georgia............. .320 2 75 17 24 2 1 4 15 40 .533 7 3 20 2 .395 1 0 0-0 51 20 2 .973 Southern California. .302 3 106 16 32 5 1 8 16 63 .594 8 5 14 1 .378 0 1 2-4 75 29 3 .972 Stanford............ .271 4 129 23 35 4 1 3 22 50 .388 12 7 17 3 .358 3 2 0-2 108 45 3 .981 Nebraska............ .229 2 70 9 16 2 1 5 9 35 .500 5 0 19 0 .280 0 0 0-1 51 18 5 .932 Cal State Fullerton. .221 4 131 19 29 7 0 5 19 51 .389 13 1 33 1 .293 2 2 7-8 108 42 2 .987 Totals.............. .314 918 288 6 190 .521 29 18 14 36-51 268 .971 26 200 49 43 478 97 170 .391 11 684 28 (All games Sorted by Earned run avg) Team ERA W-L G CG SHO/CBO SV IP H R ER BB SO 2B 3B HR AB B/Avg WP HBP BK SFA SHA Cal State Fullerton. 3.25 1-2 4 0 0/0 0 36.0 31 15 13 3 24 2 1 6 130 .238 1 5 2 1 1 Nebraska............ 4.76 0-1 2 1 0/0 0 17.0 19 11 9 3 12 3 0 3 64 .297 2 3 1 1 3 Miami (Fla.)........ 5.75 4-0 4 0 0/0 1 36.0 44 23 23 15 22 6 1 5 144 .306 4 4 1 2 0 Stanford............ 6.00 3-1 4 0 0/0 3 36.0 39 26 24 16 31 11 0 2 139 .281 0 1 1 2 2 Southern California. 6.12 1-2 3 0 0/0 0 25.0 27 19 17 12 25 6 1 4 96 .281 6 3 2 0 1 Tulane.............. 8.31 1-2 3 0 0/0 1 26.0 35 29 24 18 18 7 1 4 107 .327 0 4 2 4 2 Tennessee........... 11.57 2-2 4 0 0/0 0 35.0 54 47 45 27 29 6 0 10 151 .358 7 7 1 3 1 Georgia............. 13.76 0-2 2 0 0/0 0 17.0 39 30 26 3 9 8 2 9 87 .448 1 2 1 1 1 Totals.............. 7.14 26 0/0 228.0 200 97 49 43 .314 29 14 12-12 1 5 288 181 170 6 918 21 11 11 PB - Tennessee 2, USC 1, CS-Fullerton 1. Pickoffs - USC 2, CS-Fullerton 1, Nebraska 1, Miami (Fla.) 1, Tennessee 1. (All games Sorted by Fielding pct) Team C PO A E FLD% DPs SBA CSB SBA% PB CI Miami (Fla.)........ 157 108 47 2 .987 5 6 2 .750 0 0 Cal State Fullerton. 152 108 42 2 .987 7 0 1 .000 1 0 Stanford............ 156 108 45 3 .981 2 4 1 .800 0 0 Tennessee........... 151 105 43 3 .980 3 10 2 .833 2 0 Georgia............. 73 51 20 2 .973 2 7 1 .875 0 0 Southern California. 107 75 29 3 .972 1 3 3 .500 1 0 Nebraska............ 74 51 18 5 .932 3 3 2 .600 0 0 Tulane.............. 110 78 24 8 .927 1 3 3 .500 0 0 Totals.............. 980 268 .971 36 .706 0 684 28 24 15 4

Category Leaders


2001 NCAA College World Series Conference Batting Leaders (as of Aug 03, 2007) (All games) Hitting minimums - 1 Games 9 AB Pitching minimums - 1 Games 5 IP Batting avg ----------- 1. Tennessee........... .394 2. Miami (Fla.)........ .373 3. Tulane.............. .343 4. Georgia............. .320 5. Southern California. .302 6. Stanford............ .271 7. Nebraska............ .229 8. Cal State Fullerton. .221 Slugging pct ------------ 1. Miami (Fla.)........ .641 2. Tennessee........... .638 3. Southern California. .594 4. Georgia............. .533 5. Nebraska............ .500 6. Tulane.............. .438 7. Cal State Fullerton. .389 8. Stanford............ .388 On base pct ----------- 1. Miami (Fla.)........ .483 2. Tennessee........... .451 3. Tulane.............. .408 4. Georgia............. .395 5. Southern California. .378 6. Stanford............ .358 7. Cal State Fullerton. .293 8. Nebraska............ .280 Runs scored ----------- 1. Miami (Fla.)........ 49 2. Tennessee........... 48 3. Stanford............ 23 4. Tulane.............. 19 Cal State Fullerton. 19 6. Georgia............. 17 7. Southern California. 16 8. Nebraska............ 9 Hits ---- 1. Tennessee........... 63 2. Miami (Fla.)........ 53 3. Tulane.............. 36 4. Stanford............ 35 5. Southern California. 32 6. Cal State Fullerton. 29 7. Georgia............. 24 8. Nebraska............ 16 Runs batted in -------------- 1. Miami (Fla.)........ 46 2. Tennessee........... 45 3. Stanford............ 22 4. Cal State Fullerton. 19 5. Tulane.............. 18 6. Southern California. 16 7. Georgia............. 15 8. Nebraska............ 9 Doubles ------- 1. Tennessee........... 11 Miami (Fla.)........ 11 3. Cal State Fullerton. 7 Tulane.............. 7 5. Southern California. 5 6. Stanford............ 4 7. Nebraska............ 2 Georgia............. 2 Triples ------- 1. Tennessee........... 2 2. Georgia............. 1 Nebraska............ 1 Stanford............ 1 Southern California. 1 Home runs --------- 1. Miami (Fla.)........ 9 2. Southern California. 8 Tennessee........... 8 4. Cal State Fullerton. 5 Nebraska............ 5 6. Georgia............. 4 7. Stanford............ 3 8. Tulane.............. 1 Total bases ----------- 1. Tennessee........... 102 2. Miami (Fla.)........ 91 3. Southern California. 63 4. Cal State Fullerton. 51 5. Stanford............ 50 6. Tulane.............. 46 7. Georgia............. 40 8. Nebraska............ 35 Total plate appearances ----------------------- 1. Tennessee........... 183 2. Miami (Fla.)........ 180 3. Stanford............ 153 4. Cal State Fullerton. 149 5. Tulane.............. 123 6. Southern California. 120 7. Georgia............. 86 8. Nebraska............ 75 At bats ------- 1. Tennessee........... 160 2. Miami (Fla.)........ 142 3. Cal State Fullerton. 131 4. Stanford............ 129 5. Southern California. 106 6. Tulane.............. 105 7. Georgia............. 75 8. Nebraska............ 70 Walks ----- 1. Miami (Fla.)........ 30 2. Cal State Fullerton. 13 Tennessee........... 13 4. Stanford............ 12 5. Tulane.............. 9 6. Southern California. 8 7. Georgia............. 7 8. Nebraska............ 5 Hit by pitch ------------ 1. Stanford............ 7 2. Tennessee........... 6 3. Southern California. 5 4. Tulane.............. 4 5. Georgia............. 3 Miami (Fla.)........ 3 7. Cal State Fullerton. 1 Strikeouts ---------- 1. Cal State Fullerton. 33 2. Miami (Fla.)........ 30 3. Tennessee........... 20 Georgia............. 20 5. Nebraska............ 19 6. Stanford............ 17 Tulane.............. 17 8. Southern California. 14 Sac bunts --------- 1. Tulane.............. 3 2. Cal State Fullerton. 2 Miami (Fla.)........ 2 Stanford............ 2 5. Tennessee........... 1 Southern California. 1 Sac flies --------- 1. Stanford............ 3 Tennessee........... 3 Miami (Fla.)........ 3 4. Cal State Fullerton. 2 Tulane.............. 2 6. Georgia............. 1 Stolen bases ------------ 1. Miami (Fla.)........ 13 2. Tennessee........... 12 3. Cal State Fullerton. 7 4. Southern California. 2 Tulane.............. 2 Caught stealing --------------- 1. Miami (Fla.)........ 4 2. Tulane.............. 3 3. Stanford............ 2 Southern California. 2 Tennessee........... 2 6. Nebraska............ 1 Cal State Fullerton. 1 Steal attempts -------------- 1. Miami (Fla.)........ 17 2. Tennessee........... 14 3. Cal State Fullerton. 8 4. Tulane.............. 5 5. Southern California. 4 6. Stanford............ 2 7. Nebraska............ 1 Grounded into DP ---------------- 1. Tulane.............. 6 2. Tennessee........... 4 3. Stanford............ 3 4. Georgia............. 2 5. Southern California. 1 Cal State Fullerton. 1 Miami (Fla.)........ 1
2001 NCAA College World Series Conference Pitching Leaders (as of Aug 03, 2007) (All games) Hitting minimums - 1 Games 9 AB Pitching minimums - 1 Games 5 IP Earned run avg -------------- 1. Cal State Fullerton. 3.25 2. Nebraska............ 4.76 3. Miami (Fla.)........ 5.75 4. Stanford............ 6.00 5. Southern California. 6.12 6. Tulane.............. 8.31 7. Tennessee........... 11.57 8. Georgia............. 13.76 Opposing bat avg ---------------- 1. Cal State Fullerton. .238 2. Stanford............ .281 3. Southern California. .281 4. Nebraska............ .297 5. Miami (Fla.)........ .306 6. Tulane.............. .327 7. Tennessee........... .358 8. Georgia............. .448 Innings pitched --------------- 1. Cal State Fullerton. 36.0 Stanford............ 36.0 Miami (Fla.)........ 36.0 4. Tennessee........... 35.0 5. Tulane.............. 26.0 6. Southern California. 25.0 7. Georgia............. 17.0 Nebraska............ 17.0 Batters struck out ------------------ 1. Stanford............ 31 2. Tennessee........... 29 3. Southern California. 25 4. Cal State Fullerton. 24 5. Miami (Fla.)........ 22 6. Tulane.............. 18 7. Nebraska............ 12 8. Georgia............. 9 Batters SO out looking ---------------------- 1. Tennessee........... 10 2. Stanford............ 9 3. Southern California. 8 4. Cal State Fullerton. 7 Nebraska............ 7 6. Tulane.............. 4 7. Miami (Fla.)........ 2 8. Georgia............. 1 Wins ---- 1. Miami (Fla.)........ 4 2. Stanford............ 3 3. Tennessee........... 2 4. Tulane.............. 1 Southern California. 1 Cal State Fullerton. 1 Losses ------ 1. Georgia............. 2 Cal State Fullerton. 2 Tennessee........... 2 Tulane.............. 2 Southern California. 2 6. Nebraska............ 1 Stanford............ 1 Saves ----- 1. Stanford............ 3 2. Miami (Fla.)........ 1 Tulane.............. 1 Runners picked off ------------------ 1. Southern California. 2 2. Cal State Fullerton. 1 Nebraska............ 1 Tennessee........... 1 Miami (Fla.)........ 1 Sac bunts allowed ----------------- 1. Nebraska............ 3 2. Tulane.............. 2 Stanford............ 2 4. Georgia............. 1 Tennessee........... 1 Cal State Fullerton. 1 Southern California. 1 Sac flies allowed ----------------- 1. Tulane.............. 4 2. Tennessee........... 3 3. Stanford............ 2 Miami (Fla.)........ 2 5. Georgia............. 1 Cal State Fullerton. 1 Nebraska............ 1 Hits allowed ------------ 1. Nebraska............ 19 2. Southern California. 27 3. Cal State Fullerton. 31 4. Tulane.............. 35 5. Georgia............. 39 Stanford............ 39 7. Miami (Fla.)........ 44 8. Tennessee........... 54 Runs allowed ------------ 1. Nebraska............ 11 2. Cal State Fullerton. 15 3. Southern California. 19 4. Miami (Fla.)........ 23 5. Stanford............ 26 6. Tulane.............. 29 7. Georgia............. 30 8. Tennessee........... 47 Earned runs allowed ------------------- 1. Nebraska............ 9 2. Cal State Fullerton. 13 3. Southern California. 17 4. Miami (Fla.)........ 23 5. Tulane.............. 24 Stanford............ 24 7. Georgia............. 26 8. Tennessee........... 45 Walks allowed ------------- 1. Nebraska............ 3 Cal State Fullerton. 3 Georgia............. 3 4. Southern California. 12 5. Miami (Fla.)........ 15 6. Stanford............ 16 7. Tulane.............. 18 8. Tennessee........... 27 Doubles allowed --------------- 1. Cal State Fullerton. 2 2. Nebraska............ 3 3. Southern California. 6 Tennessee........... 6 Miami (Fla.)........ 6 6. Tulane.............. 7 7. Georgia............. 8 8. Stanford............ 11 Triples allowed --------------- 1. Nebraska............ 0 Tennessee........... 0 Stanford............ 0 4. Miami (Fla.)........ 1 Tulane.............. 1 Southern California. 1 Cal State Fullerton. 1 8. Georgia............. 2 Home runs allowed ----------------- 1. Stanford............ 2 2. Nebraska............ 3 3. Southern California. 4 Tulane.............. 4 5. Miami (Fla.)........ 5 6. Cal State Fullerton. 6 7. Georgia............. 9 8. Tennessee........... 10 Wild pitches ------------ 1. Tennessee........... 7 2. Southern California. 6 3. Miami (Fla.)........ 4 4. Nebraska............ 2 5. Georgia............. 1 Cal State Fullerton. 1 Balks ----- 1. Southern California. 2 Tulane.............. 2 Cal State Fullerton. 2 4. Stanford............ 1 Georgia............. 1 Nebraska............ 1 Miami (Fla.)........ 1 Tennessee........... 1 Hit batters ----------- 1. Tennessee........... 7 2. Cal State Fullerton. 5 3. Miami (Fla.)........ 4 Tulane.............. 4 5. Nebraska............ 3 Southern California. 3 7. Georgia............. 2 8. Stanford............ 1 Intentional BB allowed ---------------------- 1. Tennessee........... 2 2. Tulane.............. 1
2001 NCAA College World Series Conference Fielding Leaders (as of Aug 03, 2007) (All games) Hitting minimums - 1 Games Pitching minimums - 1 Games 5 IP Fielding pct ------------ 1. Miami (Fla.)........ .987 2. Cal State Fullerton. .987 3. Stanford............ .981 4. Tennessee........... .980 5. Georgia............. .973 6. Southern California. .972 7. Nebraska............ .932 8. Tulane.............. .927 Chances ------- 1. Miami (Fla.)........ 157 2. Stanford............ 156 3. Cal State Fullerton. 152 4. Tennessee........... 151 5. Tulane.............. 110 6. Southern California. 107 7. Nebraska............ 74 8. Georgia............. 73 Putouts ------- 1. Miami (Fla.)........ 108 Stanford............ 108 Cal State Fullerton. 108 4. Tennessee........... 105 5. Tulane.............. 78 6. Southern California. 75 7. Nebraska............ 51 Georgia............. 51 Assists ------- 1. Miami (Fla.)........ 47 2. Stanford............ 45 3. Tennessee........... 43 4. Cal State Fullerton. 42 5. Southern California. 29 6. Tulane.............. 24 7. Georgia............. 20 8. Nebraska............ 18 Errors ------ 1. Tulane.............. 8 2. Nebraska............ 5 3. Tennessee........... 3 Stanford............ 3 Southern California. 3 6. Georgia............. 2 Cal State Fullerton. 2 Miami (Fla.)........ 2 Fielding double plays --------------------- 1. Cal State Fullerton. 7 2. Miami (Fla.)........ 5 3. Nebraska............ 3 Tennessee........... 3 5. Georgia............. 2 Stanford............ 2 7. Southern California. 1 Tulane.............. 1 Stolen bases against -------------------- 1. Tennessee........... 10 2. Georgia............. 7 3. Miami (Fla.)........ 6 4. Stanford............ 4 5. Southern California. 3 Nebraska............ 3 Tulane.............. 3 Caught stealing by ------------------ 1. Southern California. 3 Tulane.............. 3 3. Nebraska............ 2 Miami (Fla.)........ 2 Tennessee........... 2 6. Georgia............. 1 Stanford............ 1 Cal State Fullerton. 1 Steal attempts against ---------------------- 1. Tennessee........... 12 2. Miami (Fla.)........ 8 Georgia............. 8 4. Tulane.............. 6 Southern California. 6 6. Stanford............ 5 Nebraska............ 5 8. Cal State Fullerton. 1 Passed balls ------------ 1. Tennessee........... 2 2. Cal State Fullerton. 1 Southern California. 1 Catchers interference ---------------------

Per-Game Statistics


2001 NCAA College World Series Conference Per-Game Statistics (as of Aug 03, 2007) (All games Sorted by Batting avg) Team G AB H/g 2B/g 3B/g HR/g BB/g SO/g RBI/g SB/g R/g *AB *R *H *RBI *BB *K *TB *Fly *Gnd Tennessee........... 4 160 15.75 2.75 .50 2.00 3.25 5.00 11.25 3.00 12.00 87 26 34 24 7 10 55 24 18 Miami (Fla.)........ 4 142 13.25 2.75 .00 2.25 7.50 7.50 11.50 3.25 12.25 78 27 29 25 16 16 50 17 16 Tulane.............. 3 105 12.00 2.33 .00 .33 3.00 5.67 6.00 .67 6.33 85 15 29 14 7 13 37 17 26 Georgia............. 2 75 12.00 1.00 .50 2.00 3.50 10.00 7.50 .00 8.50 87 19 27 17 8 23 46 17 19 Southern California. 3 106 10.67 1.67 .33 2.67 2.67 4.67 5.33 .67 5.33 88 13 26 13 6 11 52 25 25 Stanford............ 4 129 8.75 1.00 .25 .75 3.00 4.25 5.50 .00 5.75 84 15 22 14 7 11 32 27 24 Nebraska............ 2 70 8.00 1.00 .50 2.50 2.50 9.50 4.50 .00 4.50 93 12 21 12 6 25 46 21 22 Cal State Fullerton. 4 131 7.25 1.75 .00 1.25 3.25 8.25 4.75 1.75 4.75 87 12 19 12 8 22 34 23 24 Totals.............. 26 918 11.08 1.88 .23 1.65 3.73 6.54 7.31 1.38 7.69 85 18 26 17 9 15 44 22 21 * = average based on 100 plate appearances (All games Sorted by Earned run avg) Team G IP IP/G W-L +IP +H +R +ER +BB +SO +2B +3B +HR +BF +ERA +Fly +Gnd Cal State Fullerton. 4 36.0 9.0 1-2 9.0 7.8 3.8 3.2 0.8 6.0 0.5 0.2 1.5 35.0 3.25 9.0 9.8 Nebraska............ 2 17.0 8.1 0-1 9.0 10.1 5.8 4.8 1.6 6.4 1.6 0.0 1.6 39.2 4.76 8.5 9.0 Miami (Fla.)........ 4 36.0 9.0 4-0 9.0 11.0 5.8 5.8 3.8 5.5 1.5 0.2 1.2 41.2 5.75 9.8 9.8 Stanford............ 4 36.0 9.0 3-1 9.0 9.8 6.5 6.0 4.0 7.8 2.8 0.0 0.5 40.0 6.00 7.8 10.2 Southern California. 3 25.0 8.1 1-2 9.0 9.7 6.8 6.1 4.3 9.0 2.2 0.4 1.4 40.3 6.12 9.0 6.8 Tulane.............. 3 26.0 8.2 1-2 9.0 12.1 10.0 8.3 6.2 6.2 2.4 0.3 1.4 46.7 8.31 12.8 6.6 Tennessee........... 4 35.0 8.2 2-2 9.0 13.9 12.1 11.6 6.9 7.5 1.5 0.0 2.6 48.6 11.57 8.5 9.8 Georgia............. 2 17.0 8.1 0-2 9.0 20.6 15.9 13.8 1.6 4.8 4.2 1.1 4.8 49.8 13.76 10.1 10.6 Totals.............. 26 228.0 8.2 12-12 9.0 11.4 7.9 7.1 3.8 6.7 1.9 0.2 1.7 42.2 7.14 9.3 9.2 + = average based on 9-inning game

Analysis Statistics


2001 NCAA College World Series Conference BATTING ANALYSIS (as of Aug 03, 2007) (All games Sorted by Player Name) vs Left vs Right w/Runners On w/Bases Empty w/Bases Loaded Rch as Leadoff Fly Gnd Fly/ Team H AB Avg H AB Avg H AB Avg H AB Avg H AB Avg Rch Ops Pct Out Out Gnd ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Miami (Fla.)........ 13 42 .310 40 100 .400 31 88 .352 22 54 .407 3 7 .429 19 33 .576 32 29 1.1 Cal State Fullerton. 10 50 .200 19 81 .235 16 47 .340 13 84 .155 0 1 .000 9 36 .250 35 36 1.0 Georgia............. 0 0 .000 24 75 .320 12 40 .300 12 35 .343 2 3 .667 8 18 .444 15 17 0.9 Nebraska............ 15 57 .263 1 13 .077 4 25 .160 12 45 .267 0 0 .000 4 18 .222 16 17 0.9 Stanford............ 13 47 .277 22 82 .268 20 63 .317 15 66 .227 3 5 .600 16 35 .457 42 37 1.1 Tennessee........... 9 16 .563 54 144 .375 37 89 .416 26 71 .366 1 1 1.000 18 35 .514 44 33 1.3 Tulane.............. 3 5 .600 33 100 .330 21 57 .368 15 48 .313 1 5 .200 14 27 .519 22 32 0.7 Southern California. 5 21 .238 27 85 .318 11 47 .234 21 59 .356 1 3 .333 10 26 .385 30 31 1.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Totals.............. 68 238 .286 220 680 .324 152 456 .333 136 462 .294 11 25 .440 98 228 .430 236 232 1.0 With Runners w/Rnr on 3rd 2- Success #Rnrs Pinch Hitting In Scoring Pos And LT 2 Out With 2 Out Out Advancing Rnrs Adv Rnrs Rch Rch Team H AB Avg H AB Avg RBI Ops Pct H AB Avg RBI Adv Ops Pct w/Out LOB Err FC KL ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Miami (Fla.)........ 0 1 .000 20 58 .345 13 23 .565 14 43 .326 15 49 99 .495 14 31 2 6 10 Cal State Fullerton. 1 4 .250 9 28 .321 3 7 .429 10 44 .227 11 27 54 .500 10 22 2 1 12 Georgia............. 0 2 .000 5 19 .263 3 4 .750 5 22 .227 3 19 46 .413 2 15 0 4 8 Nebraska............ 0 1 .000 3 16 .188 1 3 .333 6 25 .240 5 8 27 .296 2 12 2 2 8 Stanford............ 1 5 .200 15 36 .417 7 10 .700 11 41 .268 9 33 71 .465 10 25 3 1 1 Tennessee........... 3 6 .500 26 57 .456 16 22 .727 17 50 .340 13 54 98 .551 15 30 3 2 2 Tulane.............. 0 2 .000 13 34 .382 8 15 .533 7 29 .241 5 34 65 .523 12 23 3 2 5 Southern California. 0 1 .000 6 30 .200 3 6 .500 11 36 .306 6 22 52 .423 9 26 0 6 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Totals.............. 5 22 .227 97 278 .349 54 90 .600 81 290 .279 67 246 512 .480 74 185 15 24 48
2001 NCAA College World Series Conference PITCHING ANALYSIS (as of Aug 03, 2007) (All games Sorted by Player Name) vs Left vs Right w/Runners On w/Bases Empty Rch by Leadoff with 2 Outs Fly Gnd Fly/ Team H AB Avg H AB Avg H AB Avg H AB Avg Rch Ops Pct H AB Avg Out Out Gnd ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Miami (Fla.)........ 18 52 .346 26 92 .283 21 76 .276 23 68 .338 16 36 .444 12 44 .273 39 39 1.0 Cal State Fullerton. 10 51 .196 21 79 .266 12 48 .250 19 82 .232 16 36 .444 7 38 .184 36 39 0.9 Georgia............. 17 39 .436 22 48 .458 19 42 .452 20 45 .444 9 17 .529 14 30 .467 19 20 0.9 Nebraska............ 8 30 .267 11 34 .324 9 31 .290 10 33 .303 9 17 .529 1 15 .067 16 17 0.9 Stanford............ 17 58 .293 22 81 .272 24 59 .407 15 80 .188 10 36 .278 11 44 .250 31 41 0.8 Tennessee........... 17 50 .340 37 101 .366 31 96 .323 23 55 .418 21 35 .600 14 46 .304 33 38 0.9 Tulane.............. 15 43 .349 20 64 .313 23 61 .377 12 46 .261 8 26 .308 16 43 .372 37 19 1.9 Southern California. 8 30 .267 19 66 .288 13 43 .302 14 53 .264 9 25 .360 6 30 .200 25 19 1.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Totals.............. 110 353 .312 178 565 .315 152 456 .333 136 462 .294 98 228 .430 81 290 .279 236 232 1.0 IP/ K/BB Stolen Bases Team App-GS App *H/g *R/g *ER/g *BB/g *SO/g Ratio *2B/g *3B/g *HR/g *FO/g *GO/g *BF/g SBA ATT Pct ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Miami (Fla.)........ 4-4 9.00 11.00 5.75 5.75 3.75 5.50 1.5 1.50 0.25 1.25 9.75 9.75 41.25 6 8 .750 Cal State Fullerton. 4-4 9.00 7.75 3.75 3.25 0.75 6.00 8.0 0.50 0.25 1.50 9.00 9.75 35.00 0 1 .000 Georgia............. 2-2 8.50 20.65 15.88 13.76 1.59 4.76 3.0 4.24 1.06 4.76 10.06 10.59 49.76 7 8 .875 Nebraska............ 2-2 8.50 10.06 5.82 4.76 1.59 6.35 4.0 1.59 0.00 1.59 8.47 9.00 39.18 3 5 .600 Stanford............ 4-4 9.00 9.75 6.50 6.00 4.00 7.75 1.9 2.75 0.00 0.50 7.75 10.25 40.00 4 5 .800 Tennessee........... 4-4 8.75 13.89 12.09 11.57 6.94 7.46 1.1 1.54 0.00 2.57 8.49 9.77 48.60 10 12 .833 Tulane.............. 3-3 8.67 12.12 10.04 8.31 6.23 6.23 1.0 2.42 0.35 1.38 12.81 6.58 46.73 3 6 .500 Southern California. 3-3 8.33 9.72 6.84 6.12 4.32 9.00 2.1 2.16 0.36 1.44 9.00 6.84 40.32 3 6 .500 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Totals.............. 26-26 8.77 11.37 7.89 7.14 3.83 6.71 1.8 1.93 0.24 1.70 9.32 9.16 42.20 36 51 .706 * = average based on 9-inning game